A discussion has surfaced on Twitter about the past handful of days and it’s truthfully a single of the more substantial head-scratchers. Michigan Point out football’s Connor Cook or Michigan’s Denard Robinson, who was the much better quarterback?
The discussion all started out above a tweet about every single school’s ideal quarterback due to the fact 2000 and how they stack up with a person a further.
There have been some questionable choices in the ranking, these as Patrick Mahomes and Aaron Rodgers getting mentioned considerably far too small and Denard being mentioned surprisingly large.
Cook was ranked No. 27 when Denard came in at No. 24 ahead of the likes of Eli Manning, Rodgers, Mahomes, and Dak Prescott. This induced an immediate stir.
It is not the most egregious position ever, but to consider that Denard was a much better quarterback than Cook dinner is a bit preposterous.
But certainly Michigan lovers disagreed and tried to argue that Denard was the greater quarterback when the two were in school. Why? Because Denard was an elite runner and was on the include of EA Sports NCAA Soccer 14. Which is it.
This debate is ridiculous for the reason that the two quarterbacks were excellent at diverse matters and one observed significantly a lot more achievements and fared a lot superior in significant video games.
Michigan Point out football’s good results was driven by Cook
Michigan supporters could use the argument of “well, Michigan Condition experienced the far better team which is why Cook was good” but let’s not get it twisted. Michigan State’s offense was the ideal it’s been in a long time with Cook dinner at the helm because he was an elite passer. His accuracy was not the best because he took too numerous chances, but he could make all the throws downfield.
The offense didn’t transform significantly at all from Andrew Maxwell the calendar year just before to Cook and nonetheless it was significantly additional productive with Connor underneath heart.
Furthermore, Denard acquired worse each period and concluded his profession as Michigan’s backup quarterback though Cook dinner was better as a senior than he was as a first-yr starter and the only time he struggled in his occupation was when he had a shoulder injury in advance of the Significant Ten title game in 2015.
Denard was an elite runner and an common to a little underneath-average passer who experienced 39 vocation interceptions to just 49 landing passes. His operating capacity was the rationale he held onto the commencing task for so very long and why his incapacity to make downfield throws wasn’t a deal-breaker. He could run the offense so well because Prosperous Rodriguez wished a mobile quarterback.
Cook was an elite passer and wasn’t cell at all. He had the exact opposite strengths of Denard and just since he was a excellent passer and did not operate does not necessarily mean he’s any considerably less efficient than Robinson. You will by no means obtain anyone connect with a quarterback “great” or “elite” if they simply cannot toss the ball perfectly downfield and seem to operate if their 1st possibility is included.
Plus, did I point out how very good Cook dinner was in huge online games?
Versus rated teams, Cook averaged 262 yards with 15 touchdowns, 10 interceptions, 5 300-lawn online games, and a 7-4 history. As for Denard, he averaged 165 passing yards for each recreation with 12 touchdowns, 15 interceptions, zero 300-lawn game titles, and a 2-8 record. If we’re going to be good, he also rushed for 73 yards for each match versus these rated teams with 7 dashing scores.
So who would you just take, a quarterback who averaged 238 whole yards for every match towards ranked groups with 19 complete touchdowns and 15 interceptions — not counting fumbles — and no 300-yard video games who wins just 20 per cent of those games or a person who averages above 260 passing yards with a 300-yard effectiveness fifty percent the time with 15 touchdowns and 10 interceptions who wins close to 65 p.c of the major kinds?
If you selected Denard, you could want to re-assess.